Skip to content
Brilliant Blue Biosciences logoBrilliant BlueBiosciences
ACS Nano2015ResearchNon-viral Gene Delivery

Polymeric Nanoparticles for Non-Viral Gene Therapy Extend Brain Tumor Survival In Vivo

Antonella Mangraviti, Stephany Yi Tzeng, Kristen Lynn Kozielski, Yuan Wang, Yike Jin, David Gullotti, Mariangela Pedone, Nitsa Buaron, Ann Liu, David R. Wilson, Sarah K. Hansen, Fausto J. Rodriguez, Guo-Dong Gao, Francesco Dimeco, Henry Brem, Alessandro Olivi, Betty Tyler, Jordan J. GreenDOI 10.1021/nn504668p

Summary

Glioblastoma remains highly lethal with poor prognosis despite surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Gene therapy is a promising alternative, but viral vectors carry safety risks. Non-viral polymeric nanoparticles are safer but have historically shown poor in vivo efficacy. A biodegradable poly(beta-amino ester) (PBAE) nanoparticle system was developed to deliver a suicide gene to malignant glioma and improve survival. In vitro transfection: Ten PBAE nanoparticle formulations achieved >50% transfection with <20% toxicity in 9L cells; eight formulations in F98 cells. Three formulations were superior to Lipofectamine 2000 in 9L; fifteen.

Keywords

PolymericNanoparticlesDNATransfectionPoly(beta-amino ester)Viral vectorsChemotherapy
Purpose: Glioblastoma remains highly lethal with poor prognosis despite surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Gene therapy is a promising alternative, but viral vectors carry safety risks. Non-viral polymeric nanoparticles are safer but have historically shown poor in vivo efficacy. A biodegradable poly(beta-amino ester) (PBAE) nanoparticle system was developed to deliver a suicide gene to malignant glioma and improve survival.
Hypothesis: If PBAE nanoparticles are optimized for DNA delivery to glioma cells and administered intratumorally via convection-enhanced delivery (CED), then delivery of herpes simplex virus type I thymidine kinase (HSVtk) combined with systemic ganciclovir (GCV) will produce effective cancer cell killing in vitro and significantly extend survival in a rat malignant glioma model.
Aims: Synthesize and screen a PBAE polymer library for DNA delivery to 9L and F98 rat glioma cells. - Identify lead nanoparticle formulations with high transfection and low cytotoxicity. - Characterize the lead PBAE/DNA nanoparticle size, zeta potential, and lyophilization stability. - Evaluate HSVtk/GCV suicide gene therapy in vitro. - Assess in vivo safety, intratumoral distribution, and transfection after CED infusion. - Test therapeutic efficacy and survival benefit in a 9L gliosarcoma rat model.
Delivery system:

Component: Polymer class; Details: Biodegradable poly(beta-amino ester)s (PBAEs)

Component: Lead polymer; Details: 447: 1-(3-aminopropyl)-4-methylpiperazine end-modified poly(1,4-butanediol diacrylate-co-4-amino-1-butanol)

Component: Nanoparticle type; Details: Polymeric DNA nanoparticles

Component: Payload; Details: Plasmid DNA: GFP reporter, HSVtk suicide gene, Cy5-labeled GFP

Component: Size / zeta; Details: 447 30 w/w: 138 ± 4 nm; zeta potential 13 ± 1 mV

Component: Targeting ligand; Details: None

Component: Administration; Details: Intratumoral convection-enhanced delivery (CED); bolus injection for comparison

Component: Key feature; Details: Biodegradable, lyophilizable, safe for brain delivery; wide tumor distribution with CED

Approach: In vitro: 9L rat gliosarcoma and F98 rat glioma cell lines; GFP transfection screen; MTS cytotoxicity; HSVtk/GCV killing assay with GCV 0, 5, 50 µg/mL. - In vivo safety: Healthy wild-type F344 rats and 9L tumor-bearing rats; PBAE/GFP nanoparticles infused via CED; histopathology at day 3 and day 60; GCV tolerance. - In vivo distribution/transfection: 9L tumor-bearing rats; Cy5-labeled GFP DNA nanoparticles via CED vs bolus; immunofluorescence 24 h post-infusion. - In vivo efficacy: 9L tumor-bearing F344 rats randomized to: untreated control (n=16); GCV alone (n=8); NP-GFP + GCV (n=8); HSVtk DNA + GCV (n=8); NP-HSVtk + GCV (n=8). GCV 50 mg/kg twice daily days 4–13; single CED infusion day 6. - Disease context: Malignant glioma/gliosarcoma; no human studies.
Key methods: Polymer/nanoparticle characterization: GPC, ¹H NMR, DLS, zeta potential, TEM. - Transfection: Flow cytometry for GFP-positive cells; fluorescence microscopy. - Cytotoxicity: MTS assay. - HSVtk/GCV killing: PI/DAPI staining and cell counting. - In vivo safety: Histopathology of brain tissue. - Distribution/transfection: Immunofluorescence for GFP and Cy5; confocal microscopy. - Survival: Kaplan–Meier plots; log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test. - Statistics: One-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post-test; two-tailed t-tests; p < 0.05.
Key results: In vitro transfection: Ten PBAE nanoparticle formulations achieved >50% transfection with <20% toxicity in 9L cells; eight formulations in F98 cells. Three formulations were superior to Lipofectamine 2000 in 9L; fifteen in F98. - Lead formulation: 447 at 30 w/w led to 52 ± 1% transfection in 9L and 37 ± 4% in F98. Nanoparticles were 138 ± 4 nm with zeta potential 13 ± 1 mV. - HSVtk/GCV killing: In both 9L and F98 cells, HSVtk nanoparticles + GCV caused approximately 100% cancer cell death at 5 and 50 µg/mL GCV; GFP-transfected cells remained viable. - Lyophilization: No significant change in size, zeta potential, or transfection efficacy after lyophilization. - In vivo safety: No neurotoxicity or histopathological damage in healthy or tumor-bearing rats; 50 mg/kg GCV twice daily was tolerated. - CED distribution: CED led to transfection throughout the entire tumor mass; bolus injection transfected mainly near the needle tract. CED increased normalized GFP fluorescence by 36% vs bolus (15.8 ± 0.1 vs 11.6 ± 0.2 RFU, p < 0.0001). - Survival: PBAE/HSVtk + GCV significantly extended survival vs untreated control (p = 0.0012), GCV alone (p = 0.0102), NP-GFP + GCV (p = 0.027), and HSVtk DNA + GCV (p = 0.027).
Interpretation: The authors claim this is the first demonstration of a successful non-viral nanomedicine for HSVtk/GCV suicide gene therapy of brain cancer. Biodegradable PBAE nanoparticles enabled effective DNA delivery, wide tumor distribution via CED, and significant survival benefit in a malignant glioma model. The approach is proposed as a promising alternative to viral gene therapy for glioblastoma.
Limitations: Just Accepted manuscript: Final peer-reviewed version may differ. - Animal model only: Rat 9L gliosarcoma; no human or large-animal validation. - Single in vivo tumor model: Efficacy tested only in 9L, not F98 or other glioma models. - Small sample size: n = 8 per treatment group; control n = 16. - No median survival numbers reported in text; only survival curves and p-values. - No direct comparison to viral vectors. - No immune response or long-term toxicity data. - Invasive delivery: Requires CED or intratumoral injection; not systemic delivery. - No targeting ligand: Distribution relies on local administration. - No dose–response optimization for PBAE/HSVtk nanoparticles. - No evaluation of repeated dosing or combination with standard therapies.

Let's engineer the next delivery breakthrough together

We co-develop nanocarrier and biosensing programs with pharma, biotech and academic groups — from target selection through GMP supply.

Polymeric Nanoparticles for Non-Viral Gene Therapy Extend Brain Tumor Survival In Vivo | Brilliant Blue Biosciences