Skip to content
Brilliant Blue Biosciences logoBrilliant BlueBiosciences
Materials Science and Engineering C2016ResearchNon-viral Gene Delivery

Gene delivery efficiency and cytotoxicity of heterocyclic amine-modified PAMAM and PPI dendrimers

Maryam Hashemi, Seyed Meghdad Tabatabai, Hamideh Parhiz, Soroush Milanizadeh, Sara Amel Farzad, Khalil Abnous, Mohammad RamezaniDOI 10.1016/j.msec.2016.01.023

Summary

PAMAM and PPI dendrimers are widely investigated for gene delivery but suffer from limitations including cytotoxicity and inefficient endosomal escape. While both employ the proton sponge mechanism for endosomal release, higher generations that improve transfection also increase cytotoxicity. A systematic comparison of how the same chemical modifications affect transfection profiles across different dendrimer types and generations was lacking. ### Grafting Efficiency (TNBS Assay, Selected Derivatives) | Carrier | Targeted Grafting | Actual Grafting (%) | |-------------|-----------------------|-------------------------| | PPI4-His50 | 50% | 33.2 ± 0.85% | |.

Purpose: PAMAM and PPI dendrimers are widely investigated for gene delivery but suffer from limitations including cytotoxicity and inefficient endosomal escape. While both employ the proton sponge mechanism for endosomal release, higher generations that improve transfection also increase cytotoxicity. A systematic comparison of how the same chemical modifications affect transfection profiles across different dendrimer types and generations was lacking.
Hypothesis: Modifying the surface primary amines of PAMAM (G3, G4) and PPI (G4, G5) dendrimers with heterocyclic amines (histidine, pyridine, piperazine) with buffering capacity at endosomal pH will enhance endosomal escape via the proton sponge effect, increase transfection efficiency, and reduce cytotoxicity. The same modifications will produce different transfection and toxicity profiles between PAMAM and PPI due to their distinct structural properties.
Aims: 1. Synthesize and characterize PAMAM (G3, G4) and PPI (G4, G5) dendrimers modified with histidine, pyridine, and piperazine at varying grafting percentages (10%, 30%, 50% of primary amines) 2. Evaluate DNA condensation ability of modified dendrimers via ethidium bromide exclusion assay 3. Measure buffering capacity of modified dendrimers at endosomal pH range (4.5-7.5) by acid-base titration 4. Assess transfection efficiency in murine neuroblastoma (Neuro-2a) cells using luciferase reporter plasmid 5. Determine cytotoxicity of dendriplexes by MTT assay 6. Investigate the role of proton sponge effect using bafilomycin A1 inhibition 7. Characterize particle size and zeta potential of optimal formulations
Delivery system:

Component: Dendrimer Types; Description: • PAMAM (poly-amidoamine): G3 (32 surface amines, MW 6909) and G4 (64 surface amines, MW 14,215)<br>• PPI (poly-propylenimine): G4 (32 surface amines, MW 3513.9) and G5 (64 surface amines, MW 7168.1)

Component: Modifications; Description: Conjugation via amidation (EDC/HOBt coupling) of primary amines with:<br>• Histidine (imidazole ring, pKa ~6.0)<br>• 3-Pyridylacetic acid (pyridine ring, pKa ~5.2)<br>• Piperazine-2-carboxylic acid (piperazine ring, pKa ~5.6)

Component: Grafting Percentages; Description: 10%, 30%, 50% of surface primary amines (targeted); actual via TNBS assay (Table 1)

Component: Payload; Description: pRL-CMV-Luc plasmid DNA (Renilla luciferase reporter)

Component: Cell Model; Description: Neuro-2a (murine neuroblastoma) cells

Component: Controls; Description: Unmodified PPI (G4, G5) and PAMAM (G3, G4); bafilomycin A1 treatment for mechanism

Component: Complexation Ratio; Description: C/P (carrier/plasmid, wt/wt) ratios: 2, 4, 6

Approach:

Parameter: Synthesis; Details: EDC/HOBt coupling; 24 h reaction; dialysis (6-8 kDa MWCO) for 72 h; freeze-dried

Parameter: Characterization; Details: FTIR (amide bond confirmation); ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR (selected derivatives); TNBS assay (grafting percentage)

Parameter: DNA Condensation; Details: Ethidium bromide exclusion assay; stepwise addition of polymer to DNA (5 μg); fluorescence at 510/590 nm

Parameter: Buffering Capacity; Details: Acid-base titration (0.1 M HCl); pH range 12 → 3; buffering capacity (β) = ΔA/ΔpH (endosomal pH 4.5-7.5)

Parameter: Transfection; Details: 96-well plate; 1×10⁴ cells/well; 200 ng pDNA/well; 4 h exposure; 24 h post-transfection; luciferase assay (RLU/4000 cells)

Parameter: Bafilomycin A1 Treatment; Details: 200 nM, 1 h pre-treatment; luciferase assay as above

Parameter: Cytotoxicity; Details: MTT assay; 4 h exposure; 24 h post-treatment; 575/630 nm absorbance

Parameter: Particle Characterization; Details: DLS (size) and zeta potential (Malvern Nano ZS); C/P ratios 2, 4, 6

Parameter: Replicates; Details: ≥3 independent experiments; mean ± SD

Parameter: Statistical Tests; Details: Student's t-test; P ≤ 0.05 considered significant

Key methods:

Analysis Category: Grafting Efficiency; Methods: TNBS assay (2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid); absorbance at 410 nm; standard curve of unmodified dendrimers

Analysis Category: Chemical Characterization; Methods: FTIR (amide I band 1644-1649 cm⁻¹); ¹H NMR (D₂O); ¹³C NMR (amide bond confirmation)

Analysis Category: DNA Condensation; Methods: Ethidium bromide fluorescence quenching (Jasco FP-6200); 510 nm excitation/590 nm emission

Analysis Category: Buffering Capacity; Methods: Acid-base titration (0.1 M HCl); pH meter (JENWAY3310); β = ΔA/ΔpH

Analysis Category: Transfection Efficiency; Methods: Promega luciferase assay; Berthold Luminometer; RLU normalized to 4000 cells

Analysis Category: Cytotoxicity; Methods: MTT assay (5 mg/mL stock); DMSO solubilization; 575/630 nm absorbance

Analysis Category: Particle Size/Zeta Potential; Methods: Malvern Nano ZS (DLS); HBG buffer; 30 measurements per sample; n=3

Key results: ### Grafting Efficiency (TNBS Assay, Selected Derivatives)

Carrier: PPI4-His50; Targeted Grafting: 50%; Actual Grafting (%): 33.2 ± 0.85%

Carrier: PPI4-Pyr50; Targeted Grafting: 50%; Actual Grafting (%): 36.2 ± 2.0%

Carrier: PPI4-Pip50; Targeted Grafting: 50%; Actual Grafting (%): 37.1 ± 1.02%

Carrier: PPI5-Pyr50; Targeted Grafting: 50%; Actual Grafting (%): 40.2 ± 0.85%

Carrier: PPI5-Pip50; Targeted Grafting: 50%; Actual Grafting (%): 33.3 ± 1.67%

Carrier: PPI5-His50; Targeted Grafting: 50%; Actual Grafting (%): 46.9 ± 2.01%

Carrier: PAMAM4-Pip50; Targeted Grafting: 50%; Actual Grafting (%): 40.58 ± 1.78%

Buffering Capacity (Endosomal pH 4.5-7.5, mmol H⁺:

Carrier: G4 PPI; Unmodified: 3.99 ± 0.25; Modified (50%): PPI4-His50: 7.15; Fold Increase: 1.8×

Carrier: G5 PPI; Unmodified: 14.97 ± 1.52; Modified (50%): PPI5-Pip50: 22.72; Fold Increase: 1.5×

Carrier: G3 PAMAM; Unmodified: 7.24 ± 0.45; Modified (50%): PAMAM3-His50: 10.22; Fold Increase: 1.4×

Carrier: G4 PAMAM; Unmodified: 23.69 ± 0.75; Modified (50%): PAMAM4-Pip50: 48.97; Fold Increase: 2.1×

Transfection Efficiency (Fold Increase vs. Unmodified):

Carrier: PPI4-His50; C/P Ratio: C/P=6; Fold Increase: 3×; Significance: NS

Carrier: PPI5-Pyr50; C/P Ratio: C/P=6; Fold Increase: 22.7×; Significance: P < 0.001

Carrier: PPI5-His50; C/P Ratio: C/P=6; Fold Increase: 10.35×; Significance: P < 0.001

Carrier: PPI5-Pyr30; C/P Ratio: C/P=6; Fold Increase: 8.20×; Significance: P < 0.001

Carrier: PPI5-Pip50; C/P Ratio: C/P=6; Fold Increase: 4.75×; Significance: P < 0.001

Carrier: PAMAM3-Pip50; C/P Ratio: C/P=4; Fold Increase: 4.4×; Significance: -

Carrier: PAMAM4-Pip50; C/P Ratio: C/P=6; Fold Increase: 7.65×; Significance: -

Carrier: Best PPI vs. Best PAMAM; C/P Ratio: -; Fold Increase: 22.7× vs. 7.65×; Significance: PPI superior

Bafilomycin A1 Effect (Proton Sponge Inhibition):

Carrier: PPI5-Pyr50; Transfection Decrease: ~30-fold decrease; Significance: P < 0.001

Carrier: PAMAM4-Pip50; Transfection Decrease: ~8-fold decrease; Significance: P < 0.001

Cell Viability (MTT Assay, C:

Carrier: PPI5 (unmodified); Viability: Baseline; vs. Unmodified: -

Carrier: PPI5 derivatives; Viability: >80%; vs. Unmodified: Significantly higher (P < 0.001)

Carrier: PAMAM4 derivatives; Viability: Variable; vs. Unmodified: Some lower than unmodified (not significant for transfection)

Particle Size and Zeta Potential (Optimal Vectors):

Carrier: PPI5-Pyr50 (C/P=6); Size (nm): 224.4 ± 5.0; Zeta Potential (mV): +27.2 ± 1.45

Carrier: PPI5-Pip50 (C/P=6); Size (nm): 298.2 ± 25.1; Zeta Potential (mV): +18.3 ± 1.07

Carrier: PPI5-His50 (C/P=6); Size (nm): 198.1 ± 4.9; Zeta Potential (mV): +27.1 ± 1.52

Carrier: PAMAM4-Pip50 (C/P=6); Size (nm): 144.1 ± 4.5; Zeta Potential (mV): +10.27 ± 0.79

Carrier: PAMAM4-Pip50 (C/P=4); Size (nm): 71.5 ± 0.9; Zeta Potential (mV): +25.6 ± 1.35

Interpretation: The authors conclude that "this is the first study that compares the transfection profiles of native and modified high generation PPIs and PAMAMs in one setting." The study demonstrates that "upon varying substitutions, PPI-based dendrimers may exhibit higher transfection efficiency than their PAMAM-based counterparts with the same number of surface primary amines." Pyridine was the most effective substitution for PPI (PPI5-Pyr50 showing 22.7-fold increase), while piperazine-modified PAMAMs showed the best transfection among PAMAM-based vectors (PAMAM4-Pip50 showing 7.65-fold increase). The authors state: "Considering the unique properties of PPI and PAMAM dendrimers such as drug loading capacity for small molecules and abundant surface functional groups, these modified dendrimers may also be further developed into multifunctional systems carrying both gene and drug molecules."
10. Limitations (Explicitly Stated or Evident):

1. In vitro only: All experiments performed in Neuro-2a cells; no in vivo validation of transfection efficiency, biodistribution, or therapeutic efficacy.

2. Single cell line: Only one cell type (murine neuroblastoma) was tested; transfection efficiency may vary across different cell types.

3. Grafting efficiency lower than targeted: Actual grafting percentages were consistently lower than the targeted 10%, 30%, and 50% (e.g., 50% target yielded ~30-47% actual substitution), making precise structure-activity comparisons challenging.

4. Limited mechanistic characterization: While bafilomycin A1 confirmed proton sponge mechanism, the study did not quantify cellular uptake, endosomal escape efficiency, or intracellular trafficking of dendriplexes.

5. No in vivo toxicity: Cytotoxicity was only assessed in vitro by MTT; systemic toxicity, immunogenicity, and biocompatibility in vivo were not evaluated.

6. No comparison to commercial transfection reagents: The study did not benchmark modified dendrimers against Lipofectamine or other commercial reagents.

7. Limited structural characterization: FTIR, ¹H NMR, and ¹³C NMR were only performed on selected derivatives with best transfection activity, not on all synthesized carriers.

8. Particle size in HBG buffer: Size measurements were performed in HBG buffer, not in complete cell culture medium with serum, which may affect particle aggregation and size.

9. No siRNA delivery tested: The study focused on plasmid DNA delivery; siRNA delivery efficiency was not evaluated.

10. Transfection readout only luciferase: Only reporter gene (luciferase) expression was measured; functional delivery of therapeutic genes or protein expression kinetics was not assessed.

11. Mechanistic role of pKa not fully resolved: While the authors discuss pKa values of heterocyclic amines, a detailed correlation between pKa, buffering capacity, and transfection efficiency was not systematically established for all derivatives.

12. No surface morphology/TEM: Transmission electron microscopy of dendriplexes was not performed to confirm particle morphology and size distribution.

Report prepared based on the published Materials Science and Engineering C article. For full experimental details, supplementary data, and complete references, please refer to the original publication.

Let's engineer the next delivery breakthrough together

We co-develop nanocarrier and biosensing programs with pharma, biotech and academic groups — from target selection through GMP supply.

Gene delivery efficiency and cytotoxicity of heterocyclic amine-modified PAMAM and PPI dendrimers | Brilliant Blue Biosciences