Skip to content
Brilliant Blue Biosciences logoBrilliant BlueBiosciences
Journal of Controlled Release2020ResearchNon-viral Gene Delivery

Ionizable lipid nanoparticles encapsulating barcoded mRNA for accelerated in vivo delivery screening

Pedro P. Guimaraes, Rui Zhang, Roman Spektor, Mingchee Tan, Amanda Chung, Margaret M. Billingsley, Rakan El-Mayta, Rachel S. Riley, Lili Wang, James M. Wilson, Michael J. MitchellDOI 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.028

Summary

LNP libraries are usually screened in vitro, which poorly predicts in vivo mRNA delivery. A high-throughput in vivo platform was needed to screen many LNP formulations simultaneously and identify lead carriers for functional mRNA delivery. b-mRNA could be detected in liver at doses as low as 17 ng; b-mRNA delivery was dose-dependent with linear correlation R² = 0.9646. - 16 b-mRNA LNP formulations were pooled and screened simultaneously; F13 showed high.

Keywords

Lipid nanoparticlemRNANanoparticlesDNATransfectionNanocarriersGene delivery
Purpose: LNP libraries are usually screened in vitro, which poorly predicts in vivo mRNA delivery. A high-throughput in vivo platform was needed to screen many LNP formulations simultaneously and identify lead carriers for functional mRNA delivery.
Hypothesis: If functional mRNA is engineered with a barcode and UMI in its 3′ UTR, then multiple barcoded mRNA-LNP formulations can be pooled, injected intravenously, and quantified simultaneously by deep sequencing. This b-mRNA platform should better predict functional mRNA delivery than DNA-barcoded LNPs because the cargo more closely mimics therapeutic mRNA size and structure.
Aims: Synthesize functional barcoded mRNA (b-mRNA) encoding luciferase with barcode and UMI sequences. - Formulate and characterize a mini-library of b-mRNA LNPs. - Screen multiple b-mRNA LNP formulations simultaneously in mice for delivery to liver, spleen, and other organs. - Validate deep-sequencing delivery results against functional luciferase and EPO expression. - Compare b-mRNA LNPs with b-DNA LNPs and assess which better predicts functional mRNA delivery.
Delivery system: Platform: Ionizable lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) encapsulating barcoded mRNA. - Ionizable lipid: C12-200. - Excipients: DOPE, cholesterol, C14-PEG2000. - Payload: In vitro transcribed b-mRNA encoding firefly luciferase, with barcode, UMI, T7 promoter, PCR handle, and poly(A) tail; m5C-modified b-mRNA used for most studies. - Formulation: Microfluidic mixing of aqueous mRNA phase and ethanolic lipid phase. - Targeting ligand: None. - Route: Intravenous tail-vein injection in C57BL/6 mice. - Key lead formulation: F13; also compared F01, F04, F06, F09, F16.
Approach: In vitro: bEnd.3 cells for b-mRNA transfection; m5C vs Ψ modification comparison. - In vivo: C57BL/6 mice; pooled b-mRNA LNPs injected IV at 0.25 µg per formulation for screening; tissues harvested 4 h post-injection. - Dose–response: 17–1000 ng b-mRNA per formulation to test detection range. - Validation: F01 and F13 formulated with luciferase or EPO mRNA and injected separately; luminescence and serum EPO measured. - b-DNA comparison: Same 16 LNP formulations encapsulating b-DNA and screened identically.
Key methods: DLS for hydrodynamic diameter and PDI. - Cryo-TEM for LNP morphology. - RiboGreen assay for mRNA encapsulation efficiency. - Deep sequencing of barcodes for b-mRNA and b-DNA quantification in tissues. - IVIS imaging for in vivo luciferase expression. - ELISA for serum EPO. - Linear regression for dose–response and b-mRNA vs b-DNA correlations.
Key results: b-mRNA could be detected in liver at doses as low as 17 ng; b-mRNA delivery was dose-dependent with linear correlation R² = 0.9646. - 16 b-mRNA LNP formulations were pooled and screened simultaneously; F13 showed high delivery to liver and spleen, and F14–F16 showed high delivery to most tissues. - F13 produced higher liver and spleen luciferase expression than F01; F13 also produced significantly higher serum EPO than F01. - b-DNA LNPs showed weak correlation with b-mRNA LNPs for liver (R² = 0.0164) and spleen (R² = 0.2505) delivery. - F04 was a lead formulation for b-DNA delivery but not for b-mRNA; F13 was more potent than F04 for EPO production, indicating b-mRNA better predicts functional mRNA delivery. - LNP sizes were ~74–91 nm; most had PDI 0.174–0.233; encapsulation efficiency >85% for 11 of 16 formulations.
Interpretation: b-mRNA LNPs enable simultaneous in vivo screening of many mRNA formulations and can identify lead LNPs for functional mRNA delivery. Because b-mRNA mimics therapeutic mRNA size and structure better than b-DNA, it is a more predictive “first-pass” screen for mRNA-LNP development.
Limitations: Only mice; no large-animal validation. - Single 4 h timepoint for most delivery measurements. - No disease model or therapeutic efficacy endpoint beyond reporter/EPO expression. - No long-term safety, toxicity, or repeated-dose evaluation. - b-mRNA is a proxy and may not fully replicate every therapeutic mRNA. - Screening used one ionizable lipid class (C12-200) and a small 16-formulation mini-library. - Delivery across different organs cannot be directly compared with the quantification method used.

Let's engineer the next delivery breakthrough together

We co-develop nanocarrier and biosensing programs with pharma, biotech and academic groups — from target selection through GMP supply.

Ionizable lipid nanoparticles encapsulating barcoded mRNA for accelerated in vivo delivery screening | Brilliant Blue Biosciences