Skip to content
Brilliant Blue Biosciences logoBrilliant BlueBiosciences
Molecular Therapy2001ResearchNon-viral Gene Delivery

A Regulated, NFκB-Assisted Import of Plasmid DNA into Mammalian Cell Nuclei

Adi Mesika, Irina Grigoreva, Muriel Zohar, Ziv Reich

Summary

Transfection efficiency of nonviral gene delivery systems remains unacceptably low, largely due to the inability of plasmid DNA to effectively translocate through the nuclear pore complexes (NPCs). While substantial progress has been made in transcriptionally regulated vectors, control over nuclear targeting is usually absent in current DNA delivery systems, and a method to actively and regulatably import plasmid DNA into the nucleus is needed. ### Transfection Efficiency (Luciferase Activity) | Cell Line | pGL3 (± TNF-α) | κB-pGL3 (± TNF-α) | Fold Increase vs. pGL3 (unstimulated) |.

Purpose: Transfection efficiency of nonviral gene delivery systems remains unacceptably low, largely due to the inability of plasmid DNA to effectively translocate through the nuclear pore complexes (NPCs). While substantial progress has been made in transcriptionally regulated vectors, control over nuclear targeting is usually absent in current DNA delivery systems, and a method to actively and regulatably import plasmid DNA into the nucleus is needed.
Hypothesis: Incorporating repetitive binding sites for the inducible transcription factor NFκB into plasmid DNA will allow endogenous NFκB to bind the DNA in the cytoplasm and transport it into the nucleus via the nuclear import machinery. This "piggyback" approach will enhance nuclear import of plasmid DNA in a stimulus-dependent manner, with the κB sites additionally functioning as transcriptional enhancers to further increase gene expression, providing both nuclear targeting and transcriptional regulation.
Aims: 1. Develop plasmids containing NFκB binding sites (κB sites) that can be recognized by endogenous NFκB proteins in the cytoplasm 2. Quantify the enhancement in nuclear import of κB-containing plasmids compared to control plasmids using confocal fluorescence microscopy 3. Determine the relative contributions of nuclear import enhancement versus transcriptional enhancement to total transgene expression using time-course studies 4. Demonstrate regulation of both nuclear import and gene expression by exogenous stimuli (TNF-α, TPA) that modulate NFκB intracellular distribution
Delivery system:

Component: Strategy; Description: "Piggyback" approach — plasmid DNA modified to contain binding sites for endogenous transcription factor NFκB, which possesses nuclear localization signals (NLS) and is transported into the nucleus by the nuclear import machinery

Component: Plasmid Vectors; Description: • pNFκB-Luc: Contains 5 direct repeats of Igk κB motif (5'-GGGGACTTTCC-3') fused to a minimal promoter; κB sites essential for transgene expression<br>• κB-pGL3: Based on pGL3 with 5 κB sites cloned downstream of SV40 enhancer; κB sites do NOT directly participate in transcriptional regulation; contains 10 PNA binding sequences for site-specific fluorescent labeling<br>• pGL3 (control): Parental plasmid without κB sites; contains PNA binding sites

Component: κB Motif; Description: 5'-GGGGACTTTCC-3' (Igk κB motif); binds NFκB/Rel family members (p49, p50, p65) with picomolar affinity (K_D ~10⁻¹⁰–10⁻¹³ M)

Component: Transcription Factor; Description: Endogenous NFκB (p50/p65 heterodimer) — ubiquitously expressed, rapid nuclear translocation (minutes), inducible (cytoplasmic in resting cells), possesses NLS for nuclear import

Component: Fluorescent Labeling; Description: Site-specific hybridization to rhodamine-conjugated peptide nucleic acid (PNA) clamps; preserves native supercoiled conformation, sequence-specific, identical fluorophore content per plasmid

Component: Stimuli; Description: TNF-α (20 ng/mL) or TPA (100 ng/mL) — induce NFκB nuclear translocation

Component: Transfection Reagent; Description: SuperFect (Qiagen) — cationic polymer-based; calcium phosphate used for confirmation

Component: Reporter; Description: Luciferase (pGL3-based)

Approach:

Parameter: Cell Lines; Details: HeLa, HEK-293, Hep G2, U373 (all human, responsive to NFκB stimuli)

Parameter: Culture Conditions; Details: DMEM with 10% FCS, antibiotics; serum-starved for 6 h before transfection

Parameter: Transfection; Details: SuperFect (Qiagen), 0.25–1.0 μg DNA/10⁵ cells, 2 h transfection; calcium phosphate used for confirmation

Parameter: NFκB Induction; Details: rhTNF-α (20 ng/mL) or TPA (100 ng/mL); unless noted, induction post-transfection

Parameter: Harvest Time; Details: 18 h (standard) or variable for time-course (2, 24, 43 h post-transfection + 5 h stimulation)

Parameter: Controls; Details: • pGL3 (no κB sites) • pCDNA3 (no NFκB binding elements) • Unstimulated cells for each plasmid

Parameter: Replicates; Details: At least three independent measurements; data shown as mean ± SEM

Key methods:

Analysis Category: Functional Gene Expression; Methods: Luciferase activity assay (Promega Luciferase Assay System); normalized to total protein (Pierce) or β-galactosidase activity (Promega)

Analysis Category: Nuclear Import Visualization; Methods: Confocal fluorescence microscopy (Olympus Fluview 2000, 60× PlanApo oil immersion, NA 1.4); simultaneous fluorescence and DIC imaging; site-specific rhodamine-PNA labeling

Analysis Category: NFκB Localization Confirmation; Methods: Indirect immunofluorescence: primary antibodies (rabbit anti-p50, anti-p65; Santa Cruz); secondary Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit F(ab')₂; Nikon Eclipse TE300 microscope with Hamamatsu Orca CCD camera

Analysis Category: Image Processing; Methods: NIH Image software; ~200 images analyzed per condition from three independent experiments

Analysis Category: Statistical Analysis; Methods: Compound quantity formulation for SEM calculations

Key results: ### Transfection Efficiency (Luciferase Activity)

Cell Line: HeLa; pGL3 (± TNF-α): Baseline; κB-pGL3 (± TNF-α): Up to 35×; Fold Increase vs. pGL3 (unstimulated): Highest increase observed

Cell Line: HEK-293; pGL3 (± TNF-α): Minor effect; κB-pGL3 (± TNF-α): Significant increase; Fold Increase vs. pGL3 (unstimulated): Substantial enhancement

Cell Line: Hep G2; pGL3 (± TNF-α): Minor effect; κB-pGL3 (± TNF-α): Significant increase; Fold Increase vs. pGL3 (unstimulated): Substantial enhancement

Cell Line: U373; pGL3 (± TNF-α): Minor effect; κB-pGL3 (± TNF-α): Significant increase; Fold Increase vs. pGL3 (unstimulated): Substantial enhancement

Cell Line: Stimulation effect; pGL3 (± TNF-α): 1.3× (minimal); κB-pGL3 (± TNF-α): 1.6–19× (depending on construct); Fold Increase vs. pGL3 (unstimulated): κB-pGL3: ~10% background noise

Nuclear Import (Confocal Microscopy):

Plasmid: pGL3; Condition: Unstimulated; Nuclear Localization: Low nuclear signal; Cytoplasmic Pattern: Punctate cytoplasmic fluorescence; rim around nuclear envelope

Plasmid: pGL3; Condition: +TNF-α; Nuclear Localization: Unchanged; Cytoplasmic Pattern: No significant change

Plasmid: κB-pGL3; Condition: Unstimulated; Nuclear Localization: Clear nuclear fluorescence (majority of cells); Cytoplasmic Pattern: Significantly reduced punctate pattern

Plasmid: κB-pGL3; Condition: +TNF-α; Nuclear Localization: Increased nuclear fluorescence; Cytoplasmic Pattern: Further reduction in cytoplasmic spots

Time-Course: Nuclear Import vs. Transcriptional Enhancement:

Mechanism: Nuclear import contribution; κB-pGL3: ~12-fold; pNFκB-Luc: ~12-fold; pGL3: N/A

Mechanism: Transcriptional enhancement contribution; κB-pGL3: ~1.6-fold; pNFκB-Luc: ~19-fold; pGL3: ~1.3-fold

Mechanism: Background activity; κB-pGL3: ~10% of maximal; pNFκB-Luc: ~0.4% of maximal; pGL3: -

Mechanism: Maximum stimulated expression; κB-pGL3: Higher than pNFκB-Luc; pNFκB-Luc: ~5× lower than κB-pGL3; pGL3: Lowest

Additional Observations: - Position independence: Nuclear import enhancement (~12-fold) was insensitive to position of κB sites relative to transgene - Context dependence: Transcriptional enhancement varied by factor of ~12 between κB-pGL3 and pNFκB-Luc - Mitotic dilution effect: Nuclear import advantage diminished over time (two cell divisions) due to nuclear envelope breakdown during mitosis equalizing nuclear plasmid accumulation
Interpretation: The authors conclude that they have developed a "system for controlled, facilitated import of plasmid DNA into mammalian cell nuclei" that provides two mechanisms to increase transgene expression: (1) a ~12-fold enhancement in nuclear entry via NFκB-mediated piggyback transport, and (2) transcriptional enhancement via κB sites acting as inducible enhancers (up to 19-fold for pNFκB-Luc). Importantly, both nuclear uptake and transcription are regulatable by exogenous stimuli that modulate NFκB intracellular distribution. This approach provides a "framework for the controlled targeting of constitutive or transcriptionally regulated synthetic vectors into mammalian cell nuclei" and, when refined with tissue-specific targeting elements, could be "useful in therapeutic applications relying on gene transfer technologies."
10. Limitations (Explicitly Stated or Evident):

1. Chemical transfection only: The DNA was introduced using SuperFect or calcium phosphate "to faithfully mimic conditions relevant for DNA transfer in vivo," but the approach was not tested with clinically relevant delivery systems (e.g., lipid nanoparticles, polymer nanoparticles) or in vivo.

2. NFκB activation not cell-specific: NFκB is ubiquitously expressed and can be activated by numerous stimuli (inflammation, stress, cytokines), limiting cell/tissue specificity. The authors acknowledge this and suggest combining with "tissue-specific targeting elements."

3. Basal activity in unstimulated cells: There was weak but significant nuclear fluorescence from p65/p50 in unstimulated cells, resulting in ~10% background activity for κB-pGL3 (though only 0.4% for pNFκB-Luc).

4. Not tested in vivo: No animal studies; no demonstration of therapeutic gene delivery or efficacy in disease models.

5. Transgene expression dilution over time: The nuclear import advantage diminished after ~24 h due to mitosis (nuclear envelope breakdown), meaning the approach is most effective for non-dividing cells or short-term expression.

6. Mechanism not fully elucidated: The authors propose several mechanisms (NPC targeting, pore triggering, protection from endocytic reentry), but none are experimentally demonstrated; the relative contributions of each remain unclear.

7. No direct quantification of nuclear plasmid copy number: Nuclear import was assessed by confocal microscopy (qualitative/semi-quantitative) and by luciferase activity (indirect); direct biochemical quantification of nuclear plasmid DNA was not performed.

8. Transfection reagent-dependent: SuperFect is a cationic polymer that may itself influence nuclear delivery pathways; the results may not generalize to other delivery methods.

9. Limited cell line diversity: Four cell lines were tested, all transformed/immortalized; no primary cells, hard-to-transfect cells, or stem cells were evaluated.

10. Potential for NFκB sequestration: High plasmid concentrations might sequester endogenous NFκB, potentially affecting cellular signaling pathways or transcriptional programs beyond the reporter gene.

Report prepared based on the published Molecular Therapy article. For full experimental details and supplementary information, please refer to the original publication.

Let's engineer the next delivery breakthrough together

We co-develop nanocarrier and biosensing programs with pharma, biotech and academic groups — from target selection through GMP supply.

A Regulated, NFκB-Assisted Import of Plasmid DNA into Mammalian Cell Nuclei | Brilliant Blue Biosciences