Skip to content
Brilliant Blue Biosciences logoBrilliant BlueBiosciences
mRNA

mRNA therapeutics: from pandemic response to personalised medicine

mRNA is the cleanest genetic payload available: it acts in the cytoplasm, never enters the nucleus and cannot integrate. Its only weakness is physical fragility, and that weakness was solved by lipid nanoparticles — the same chemistry that made rapid vaccine deployment possible.

80–100 nm
Target LNP diameter for intravenous and intramuscular delivery
4 components
Ionisable lipid, cholesterol, helper lipid, PEG-lipid
~50%
Typical encapsulation efficiency for a well-formed mRNA LNP
01

The lipid nanoparticle, component by component

Ionisable lipids are the engine. They are neutral at physiological pH, which keeps the circulating particle tolerably non-toxic, and become protonated in the acidifying endosome, where they fuse with the endosomal membrane and release mRNA into the cytosol. The apparent pKa of the ionisable lipid — typically targeted to 6.2–6.5 — is the single most predictive design parameter.

Cholesterol provides structural rigidity and stability in circulation. The helper lipid, often DOPE or DSPC, shapes the packing and sets the phase behaviour of the bilayer. The PEG-lipid sits on the surface, controlling particle size and preventing aggregation and opsonisation, at the cost of reducing cellular uptake if over-used.

02

Manufacturing, quality and the delivery gap

LNPs are assembled by rapid mixing of an ethanol phase containing the lipids with an aqueous phase containing mRNA at acidic pH, followed by buffer exchange. Microfluidic mixing gives tighter size distributions than bulk methods, and downstream tangential-flow filtration removes the ethanol and concentrates the product.

Quality control is what separates a laboratory formulation from a therapeutic: particle size and polydispersity by dynamic light scattering, zeta potential for surface charge, encapsulation efficiency by the RiboGreen assay, mRNA integrity by capillary electrophoresis, and potency in a relevant cell-based assay.

The remaining problem is targeting. After intravenous administration, LNPs accumulate mainly in the liver because of ApoE adsorption and hepatocyte uptake — which is ideal for protein replacement in the liver and for vaccines delivered intramuscularly, and unhelpful for almost everything else. Selective organ targeting, added anionic or cationic components and surface ligands are all being used to redirect particles to lung, spleen or specific cell types.

  • Target an ionisable lipid pKa of 6.2–6.5 for efficient endosomal escape without excessive circulating charge.
  • Keep PEG-lipid at the lowest fraction that still prevents aggregation — 1.5 mol% or below for many formulations.
  • Verify with two orthogonal techniques: dynamic light scattering for size and zeta potential for surface charge.
  • Check encapsulation with RiboGreen — unencapsulated mRNA is the most common cause of an apparent potency loss.
03

Where mRNA delivery is heading

Personalised cancer vaccines produce a patient-specific mRNA encoding neoantigens and deliver it in the same LNP architecture — the manufacturing timeline, not the biology, is the limiting factor. In vivo gene editing delivers Cas9 mRNA and sgRNA in a single particle, turning the liver into a transient editing compartment and avoiding ex vivo cell handling entirely.

Inhaled and nebulised LNPs extend the platform to the lung; targeted LNPs carrying CAR mRNA are being evaluated for in situ T cell engineering in cancer immunotherapy. Each of these applications re-opens the same delivery question: getting the particle to the right cell, not just getting the mRNA into a cell.

Workflow

How a working experiment is built

  1. 1

    Design the mRNA

    Optimise the 5′ UTR and codon usage, add a poly(A) tail and consider base modification to reduce innate immune activation.

  2. 2

    Formulate the LNP

    Rapid-mix lipids in ethanol with mRNA in acidic buffer; keep the ionisable lipid pKa in the 6.2–6.5 window.

  3. 3

    Characterise before use

    Size, polydispersity, zeta potential and encapsulation efficiency — never proceed to biology on an uncharacterised batch.

  4. 4

    Test transfection in the target cell

    Cell-free formulation quality does not predict cellular potency; use a reporter mRNA and measure protein production over 6–48 h.

  5. 5

    Assess transient kinetics

    mRNA expression peaks between 6 and 24 h and is gone by 72 h. Design the experiment around that window.

Failure patterns

What usually goes wrong, and the fix

Good encapsulation but no protein expression

Fix: Check endosomal escape — the ionisable lipid pKa may be off, or the helper lipid fraction too high

Innate immune activation in primary cells

Fix: Use base-modified nucleotides and purified mRNA; remove double-stranded RNA by HPLC purification

Particle size drifts between batches

Fix: Control the ethanol:aqueous flow ratio and total lipid concentration; microfluidic mixing is more reproducible than bulk

Expression disappears within a day

Fix: That is the format working as designed — schedule the readout at 6–24 h rather than at 48 h

Provenance

References for this application

Every protocol on this page was reconstructed from the manufacturer’s own documentation. Use these links to confirm concentrations, catalogue numbers and cell-line-specific variants before running the experiment.

  1. [1]Thermo Fisher — Lipofectamine MessengerMAX mRNA delivery protocol
  2. [2]Mirus Bio — TransIT-mRNA transfection reagent protocol
  3. [3]Precision Nanosystems — LNP formulation and characterisation guidance
  4. [4]Nature Reviews — Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery (review)